Barrick, in a move that shows its faith that gold will continue to rise, announced an equity sale of at least $3 billion late on Tuesday, to be used to eliminate all of its fixed-price gold hedges and a portion of its floating hedges.

On Wednesday morning the world’s top gold miner boosted the offering amount to at least $3.5 billion, or as much as $4 billion if an overallotment is exercised, citing strong investor demand.

Buying back the hedges — which will result in a $5.6 billion charge to third-quarter earnings — should remove a major overhang on the company’s shares, as investors have long called for Barrick to completely exit its hedge book.

During times of weak prices, gold miners often sell a portion of their future production to protect, or hedge, against the possibility that prices will fall.

When prices rise, as they have done since 2001, the company suffers because value of the future production they’ve sold does not increase with the gold price.

Barrick will spend $1.9 billion to eliminate its entire fixed-price position of 3 million ounces — on which the company essentially loses money every time gold rises — and will pay $1 billion to buy back a portion of its floating-price position.

Jennings Research analyst Ron Coll called the move positive, both in terms of the company’s ability to fully benefit from rising gold prices and in terms of what it suggests about Barrick’s own expectations for the metal.

“It is a signal that the industry’s largest producer does not want to be caught out in what it views as a fundamentally and inflationary driven increasing gold price environment,” he said in a note.

He maintained a C$50 target on the shares, despite the dilutive impact of the offering, which could raise Barrick’s share count by as much as 12.5 percent.

Investors, however, put pressure on the stock following a delayed open on the Toronto Stock Exchange, selling it down C$1.75 to C$40.70. The price of gold XAU=, meanwhile, was hovering just below $1,000 an ounce, having risen about 5 percent so far this month.

Blackmont Capital’s Richard Gray cut his target on Barrick stock to C$48.50 from C$49.00, but said the move was a major positive for both the company and the entire gold market.

“From an overall market standpoint, the buyback of the 3 million ounces in the market should have a positive impact, but just as important is the monumental signal by the world’s largest gold company that it believes gold prices are poised to increase further,” he said in a note.

“We believe this move by Barrick will help to sustain gold prices above $1,000 an ounce over the next 6-12 months.”

Open Exchange: Spotlight – Barrick Gold Corp. – Bloomberg
Shaping the Post-Crisis World – Live! From World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland: Interview with Barrick Gold Chairman Peter Munk

Mortgages may be equitable or legal. A mortgage may take one of a number of forms, the existence of such which will depend on the jurisdiction under which the mortgage is made. Common law jurisdictions have over time created two main forms of mortgage: by legal charge and mortgage by demise.

Legal charge

To protect the lender, a mortgage by legal charge is usually recorded in a public register. Since mortgage debt is often the largest debt owed by the debtor, banks and other mortgage lenders run title searches of the real property to make certain that there are no mortgages already registered on the debtor’s property which might have higher priority. Tax liens, in some cases, will come ahead of mortgages. For this reason, if a borrower has delinquent property taxes, the bank will often pay them to prevent the lienholder from foreclosing and wiping out the mortgage.

In a mortgage by legal charge or technically “a charge by deed expressed to be by way of legal mortgage”, the debtor remains the legal owner of the property, but the creditor gains sufficient rights over it to enable them to enforce their security, such as a right to take possession of the property or sell it.

This type of mortgage is most common in the United States and, since the Law of Property Act 1925, it has been the usual form of mortgage in England and Wales.

Legal Charge Video provided by Canadian Funding Corp Innovations

Demise

Mortgages by demise were the original form of mortgage, and continue to be used in many jurisdictions, and in a small minority of states in the United States. Many other common law jurisdictions have either abolished or minimised the use of the mortgage by demise. For example, in England and Wales this type of mortgage is no longer available, by virtue of the Land Registration Act 2002.

In a mortgage by demise, the mortgagee (the lender) becomes the owner of the mortgaged property until the loan is repaid or other mortgage obligation fulfilled in full, a process known as “redemption”. This kind of mortgage takes the form of a conveyance of the property to the creditor, with a condition that the property will be returned on redemption.

Equitable

In an equitable mortgage the lender is secured by taking possession of all the original title documents of the property and by borrower’s signing a Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deed (MODTD). This document is an undertaking by the borrower that he/she has deposited the title documents with the bank with his own wish and will, in order to secure the financing.

Lender
Mortgagee is a party to whom property is mortgaged, usually a lender. Mortgage provides security to the lender. Given the large sum of money involved in financing a property, a mortgage lender will usually want security for the loan that will provide a claim upon that security and will take precedence over other creditors. A mortgage accomplishes this security.

The lender loans the money and registers the mortgage with the title to the property. The borrower gives the lender the mortgage as security for the loan, receives the funds, makes the required payments and maintains possession of the property. The borrower has the right to have the mortgage discharged from the title once the debt is paid. If the mortgager fails to repay the loan according to the conditions set forth by the lender, then the mortgagee reserves the right to foreclose on the property.

Borrower
A mortgagor is the borrower in a mortgage–they owe the obligation secured by the mortgage. Generally, the debtor must meet the conditions of the underlying loan or other obligation and the conditions of the mortgage. Otherwise, the debtor usually runs the risk of foreclosure of the mortgage by the creditor to recover the debt. Typically the debtors will be the individual home-owners, landlords or businesses who are purchasing their property by way of a loan.

Most buyers of real property would have difficulty saving enough money to make an outright purchase of real estate. The use of debt increases a buyer’s ability to buy through a combination of down payment and debt. As a result a real estate transaction seldom occurs without buyers relying on borrowed funds.

Borrowing for investment purposes
Aside from the absence of large amount of available money, there are several reasons why an investor (including a buyer of real estate) might borrow funds. Some of these include:

To diversify investments and reduce overall risk by using only part of the available funds for any one investment. However the mortgage loan enables him to purchase more assets than he would otherwise been able to, and therefore in general increases investment risk rather than reducing it.

To invest the borrowed funds at a higher rate of interest (yield) than the borrowing rate; for example, a sum is borrowed at an annual interest rate of 7% per year and used to invest in a project that returns 10% per year. This is likely to be speculative and there is usually a possibility that the project may turn out to return less than 7% per year or to lose money.

To free up equity for other purposes; for example, a commercial enterprise may prefer to use funds to purchase inventory or equipment instead of investing only in land and buildings.

To obtain a tax benefit. In some countries (such as Canada), mortgage interest is not tax deductible, but loans made for investment purposes are.

Other participants
Because of the complicated legal exchange, or conveyance, of the property, one or both of the main participants are likely to require legal representation. The terminology varies with legal jurisdiction; see lawyer, solicitor and conveyancer.

Because of the complex nature of many markets the debtor may approach a mortgage broker or financial adviser to help them source an appropriate creditor, typically by finding the most competitive loan.

The debt is, in civil law jurisdictions, referred to as hypothecation, which may make use of the services of a hypothecary to assist in the hypothecation.

Again, what is the origin of the word “mortgage”? The word “mortgage” comes from the French legal term meaning “dead pledge”. Sounds scary? Well there is something called a “live pledge”. What is the difference? A “dead pledge” was absolute in form. A “live pledge” was not conditionally dependent on its repayment solely from raising and selling crops or livestock or simply giving the crops and livestock raised on the mortgaged land. The mortgage debt remained in effect whether or not the land could successfully produce enough income to repay the debt. In theory, a mortgage required no further steps to be taken by the creditor, such as acceptance of crops and livestock in repayment.

The difficulty with this arrangement was that the lender was absolute owner of the property and could sell it or refuse to reconvey it to the borrower, who was in a weak position. Increasingly the courts of equity began to protect the borrower’s interests, so that a borrower came to have an absolute right to insist on reconveyance on redemption. This right of the borrower is known as the “equity of redemption”.

This arrangement, whereby the lender was in theory the absolute owner, but in practice had few of the practical rights of ownership, was seen in many jurisdictions as being awkwardly artificial. By statute the common law’s position was altered so that the mortgagor would retain ownership, but the mortgagee’s rights, such as foreclosure, the power of sale, and the right to take possession, would be protected.

In the United States, those states that have reformed the nature of mortgages in this way are known as lien states. A similar effect was achieved in England and Wales by the Law of Property Act 1925, which abolished mortgages by the conveyance of a fee simple.

If you are not getting it yet, Canadian Funding Corp urges you to read on to successive posts.

Meanwhile, courtesy of Canadian Funding Corp Innovations, a video!